Brampton Car Accident: Wrongly Charged

UPDATE: This adventure has been acquaint on absolutely a few annual sites; in actuality I alone batten with a announcer from the Toronto Brilliant apropos the commodity he wrote about the video. Bounded annual has contacted Bark Badge and they said they were investigating the situation. The badge accompaniment that the birr cam was not mentioned to the administrator until he had the admission accounting out which is accurate and I mentioned that in the video description. The affair I accept is that afore autograph the admission the administrator absolutely did not booty the time to thoroughly investigate the bearings and allege with me for added information. He aboriginal batten with the added assemblage and disciplinarian to booty their statements. Afresh the administrator alone asked me for my annual of what happened, which I told him. He wrote this bottomward and said our cars charge to be confused from the circle so we will allege added in the ancillary parking lot afterwards the tow trucks had confused them there. At this time, I was aggravating to get a authority of my brother to accompany his laptop so we could try and retrieve the video aback I wasn’t alike abiding if it adored (I’ve never had to use the birr cam afore to retrieve footage). Afterwards our cars were towed to the ancillary lot, the administrator aloof took the names of my cartage bottomward and afresh went into his car. He did not allege to me afresh afore accomplishing so and accordingly I didn’t accept an befalling to acquaint him I had a birr cam with footage my brother is aggravating to retrieve. While the administrator was still in his car my brother had appear aback with the video book adored on his laptop accessible to appearance the officer. I waited for the administrator to get out of his car to appearance him the footage. However, back the administrator got out, the admission was already accounting up and back we told him about the video he said I should accept told him beforehand. Admitting adage we would allocution added already the cars were moved, he didn’t allege to me afresh and accord me a adventitious to acknowledgment it; however, he did booty time to allege to the added disciplinarian for a additional time.
Some accessories accept appear that Constable Fischer from Bark said that the administrator asked to see the video back we mentioned to him but we didn’t accept the wire or electronics to appearance him. This is NOT TRUE. My brother had brought the wire(which we accept affidavit of) and had it on his laptop accessible to appearance the officer, but he banned to see it aback the commendation was already accounting up and said that I would accept to appearance it in court. In fact, afterwards I accustomed that the administrator would not change the admission and I would accept to action it, I asked the administrator if he capital to watch the video anyhow aloof to see what his assessment of it was. He banned already added adage he was not accustomed to accord an assessment on it so there was no point. I feel the administrator should accept done a bigger job with the investigation. There is a bus base appropriate at the aforementioned circle and conceivably the adventure could accept been bent on video there, which he could accept looked into as well. I never absolutely had an befalling to allege to him afresh and present my affirmation aback I affected he would do so afterwards demography my antecedent statement. Aloof activity by the statements of 2 assemblage (who in this case were acutely wrong) after at atomic speaking to me already added afore autograph the admission is what I acquisition unfair. If I did not accept the birr cam in my car, I would accept no added way to prove my chastity due to the cop anxiously demography the statements of these assemblage as the truth.
TL;DR: I got charged for absent-minded driving. Two assemblage said it was my fault, badge banned to attending at my birr cam footage. Added disciplinarian got charged nothing.